War command can be emphasized as a function that has to be exercised, more or less continuously if the army is to operate and exist. The definition is a happy one since it serves to bring out the extraordinary importance of hierarchy. The few functions carried out by or inside the armed forces are as important in respect, existence and operations.
Control can arise and vary with either size, complexity or also the differentiation of an army. At the comparison of a hundred-man army and a one-man army, the one-man army does not require authority like that of the hundred-man army. An army that would be working under a solid entity of men would be easier to control. A force can be subdivided into several units despite its size. However, coordination of the subunits would be difficult.
With the sophistication of the forces, it is possible to account for the attention paid to it, the role of chain of control increases. First, this role should coordinate and arrange everything the army needs so as to exist such as the food supply, system justice and also the sanitary services etc. Second, it enables carrying out of responsibilities and also strategize on the maximum amount of death and damage on the enemy within a remarkably short period of time and ensure no or minimum loss to itself.
The responsibilities of command can be divided into two parts. The first responsibility can be termed as functional related, and the other can be termed as output related. A working command system ought to be able to gather information with high accuracy, continuously, selectively comprehensively and fast. Reliable means must be developed to distinguish the true from the false, the relevant from the irrelevant, and material from the immaterial. Displays must be clear, detailed and comprehensive.
Outcomes of a given situation determine a lot and also enables predictions of the progress to be expected. Some of the benefits of this role is that some skills like coordination, peace and harmony among people, management skills and also respect can be established.
The other side of the coin states that command can be the source of misunderstandings between the commanders in a given force which can also result to a lot of damage and destruction. Though not always, the commanders can make wrong choices. Some lack understanding and anger management tactics. This often makes it difficult to relate with the force members and hence can be the cause of conflicts.
As this discussion implies, differences between various command systems can be resolved into the various ways in which they approach these problems. The methods used to deal with this increasing complexity, the relative attention paid to function related and output related responsibilities, the emphasis given towards any given part of command process and the strengths and weaknesses displayed in relation to the ideal- taken together, these qualities will go far toward defining the nature of any given command system.
The way commanders manage an army determines whether it is going to have a positive outcome or not. War command is the motivation for an army that is organized, nonetheless, it can potentially be the down fall of an army. Management is a crucial aspect and the commanders should value it. War can bring out good in people, and it can also bring unfavorable outcomes.
Control can arise and vary with either size, complexity or also the differentiation of an army. At the comparison of a hundred-man army and a one-man army, the one-man army does not require authority like that of the hundred-man army. An army that would be working under a solid entity of men would be easier to control. A force can be subdivided into several units despite its size. However, coordination of the subunits would be difficult.
With the sophistication of the forces, it is possible to account for the attention paid to it, the role of chain of control increases. First, this role should coordinate and arrange everything the army needs so as to exist such as the food supply, system justice and also the sanitary services etc. Second, it enables carrying out of responsibilities and also strategize on the maximum amount of death and damage on the enemy within a remarkably short period of time and ensure no or minimum loss to itself.
The responsibilities of command can be divided into two parts. The first responsibility can be termed as functional related, and the other can be termed as output related. A working command system ought to be able to gather information with high accuracy, continuously, selectively comprehensively and fast. Reliable means must be developed to distinguish the true from the false, the relevant from the irrelevant, and material from the immaterial. Displays must be clear, detailed and comprehensive.
Outcomes of a given situation determine a lot and also enables predictions of the progress to be expected. Some of the benefits of this role is that some skills like coordination, peace and harmony among people, management skills and also respect can be established.
The other side of the coin states that command can be the source of misunderstandings between the commanders in a given force which can also result to a lot of damage and destruction. Though not always, the commanders can make wrong choices. Some lack understanding and anger management tactics. This often makes it difficult to relate with the force members and hence can be the cause of conflicts.
As this discussion implies, differences between various command systems can be resolved into the various ways in which they approach these problems. The methods used to deal with this increasing complexity, the relative attention paid to function related and output related responsibilities, the emphasis given towards any given part of command process and the strengths and weaknesses displayed in relation to the ideal- taken together, these qualities will go far toward defining the nature of any given command system.
The way commanders manage an army determines whether it is going to have a positive outcome or not. War command is the motivation for an army that is organized, nonetheless, it can potentially be the down fall of an army. Management is a crucial aspect and the commanders should value it. War can bring out good in people, and it can also bring unfavorable outcomes.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.warcommand.com for more helpful information about Impact Of War Command In The Army
Comments :
0 commentaires to “Impact Of War Command In The Army”
Enregistrer un commentaire